Doing it better 1999-08-02 f ### From Reuben. > > > I presume that is an objection to the stand-alone/piggy-back dichotomy. > > > > Not at all. We have to develop piggy-back to go fast enough. Having > > standalone in the end is nice, but not a primary goal. > > So what was all that stuff about a cut-down Linux? That is clearly a > stand-alone version. Indeed. I'm being a bit contradictory. What I mean is that we should go for functionality and co-existence in other environments at the expense of standalone if necessary. I think that for other users, standalone will be unimportant. For us, though, it'll be the most exciting thing: having a box that's ours from the components up (though of course we're unlikely as things are ever to have the pleasure of designing our own hardware). -- http://sc3d.org/rrt/ | certain, a. insufficiently analysed